top of page

The Future of Non-Competes in NY: Non-Competes Reconsidered in Senate Bill S4641A

  • Daisy Elliot
  • Mar 24
  • 5 min read

Non-competes are contracts that prevent an employee from working for or starting a competing business.[1]  Typically, non-competes are enforceable for a specific period of time, ranging from six months to two years.[2]  These agreements can affect all employees, ranging from low-wage workers to CEOs.[3]  Non-competes are a controversial topic, with ongoing debate about their necessity.[4]  Advocates often argue they are necessary to protect trade secrets, while opponents argue they lower wages and limit job opportunities.[5]  In New York, non-competes remain enforceable; however, as lawmakers push for reform, their future remains uncertain.[6]

Non-competes are particularly problematic in the context of low-wage and middle-class workers, as these workers often have less access to proprietary information, reducing the need for non-competes in the first place.[7]  Further, low-wage and middle-class workers are particularly vulnerable to non-competes, as they often lack negotiation and bargaining power, and may not fully comprehend the consequences of what they are signing.[8]  Consider Michael Kenny, a single father struggling to make ends meet.[9]  He initially worked an overnight security job earning just $11 an hour, but when his childcare arrangements fell through, he had no choice but to quit.[10]  Fortunately, he soon secured a better-paying daytime security position at $15 an hour, only to find out unknowingly signed a two-year non-compete agreement.[11]  As a result, his new employer terminated him.[12]  Kenny’s financial situation deteriorated: he lost his car, declared bankruptcy, and has been unable to regain employment since.[13]  His experience displays the harsh reality faced by millions of low-wage workers bound by non-compete agreements.

In recent years, as scrutiny around non-compete agreements has heightened, several states have restricted non-compete agreements through bans or salary thresholds, and the FTC has even proposed a nationwide ban.[14]  Following Governor Kathy Hochul’s veto of a previous bill to ban non-competes in New York, a revised bill that would ban nearly all non-compete agreements across the state is now under reconsideration.[15]   

The first version of the bill, Bill A. 1278B, came to light on January 13, 2023, in the New York State Assembly.[16]  The bill was incredibly broad in scope, seeking to ban non-compete agreements for all employees in New York state, regardless of salary level or job position.[17] Importantly, there was no salary threshold that would exempt higher-income workers from the ban, a feature that many other states with successfully passed non-compete restrictions include.[18]  Hochul ultimately vetoed the bill, as she found the scope of the bill to be too broad.[19]  Hochul further emphasized that the “legislature’s one-size-fits-all approach” would not effectively handle the complexities of New York’s labor market.[20]  However, the possibility of enacting a less sweeping ban was left on the table when Hochul noted she would support a future ban as long it strikes a balance of protecting “middle-class and low-wage earners, while allowing New York’s businesses to retain highly compensated talent.”[21] 

The new and revised bill, introduced on February 10, 2025, aims to account for Hochul’s previous concerns by providing a salary threshold and carve-outs.[22]  The bill still bans non-competes for almost all workers, but leaves exceptions for highly compensated individuals[23] and health-related professionals.[24]  These changes align with Hochul’s feedback outlined in her veto message, recognizing the need for a ban to fit New York’s complex labor market by providing certain restrictions and an increasing trend to ban non-competes for healthcare professionals.[25]  Unlike the previous bill, it provides a carve-out for the sale of a business, a provision that Hochul supported in her veto message.[26]  Sale carve-outs are often viewed as necessary, as they allow for buyers in a transaction to have sellers sign non-competes, preventing sellers from using their deal proceeds to start a competitive venture.[27]  Notably, if passed, the ban would only apply to either modified or new non-competes,[28]  which protects employers from having their current contracts invalidated or altered.[29]  Given that a previous broader version of the bill already was passed by the New York legislature,[30] it is likely it will pass the state’s legislature again unless there are sudden changes in political support.   The passage and eventual enactment of this bill would be a major victory for millions of New Yorkers, ensuring greater fairness, mobility, and freedom in the job market.[31]

Overall, this revised bill is an incredibly positive and hopeful revitalization of a much-needed policy in New York.  For far too long, low-wage and middle-wage workers have been stifled by non-compete agreements that limit their mobility and career advancement.[32]  The bill strikes a pragmatic balance between protecting workers and addressing New York’s complex labor market by incorporating a salary threshold.  This comes at a crucial time, as the future of a federal ban remains uncertain under the new Trump administration.[33]  It is time for New York to join the dozens of other states[34] that restrict non-competes to protect workers for years to come.

 

[1] Non-Compete Agreements in New York State Frequently Asked Questions, N. Y. Sᴛᴀᴛᴇ Aᴛᴛʏ Gᴇɴ. (Feb. 2022) https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/non-competes.pdf [https://perma.cc/ZKD5-RWZG].

[2] Id; See also Adam Wright, Validity of Non-Compete Agreements, SɪxFɪғᴛʏ (Mar. 10, 2023) https://www.sixfifty.com/blog/validity-of-non-compete-agreements/ [https://perma.cc/695F-68AS]. 

[3] U.S. Gov’t Accountability Off., GAO-23-103785, Noncompete Agreements: Use Is Widespread to Protect Business’ Stated Interests, Restricts Job Mobility, and May Affect Wages 1 (May 2023).

[4] Evan P. Starr, J. J. Prescott & Norman D. Bishara, Noncompete Agreements in the US Labor Force, 64 J.L. & Eᴄᴏɴ. 53 (Feb. 2021).

[5] Id.

[6] Kenneth W. Taber, Rebecca C. Rizzo & Laura G. Killalea, New York Non-Compete Agreements Are Safe—for Now Non, Pɪʟʟsʙᴜʀʏ (Jan. 9, 2024) https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insights/ny-noncompete-agreements-safe-for-now.html [https://perma.cc/ACU3-ZA6L].

[7] Id.

[8]  Starr, Prescott & Bishara, supra note 4.

[9] Lauren Weber, The Noncompete Clause Gets a Closer Look, Wᴀʟʟ Sᴛ. J. (July 21, 2021) https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-noncompete-clause-gets-a-closer-look-11626872430 [https://perma.cc/SQD6-62QT].

[10] Id.

[11] Id.

[12] Id.

[13] Id.

[14] The FTC noncompete ban proposal was struck down by a Federal District Court this August in Ryan LLC v. FTC. The decision has been appealed. FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes, Fᴇᴅ. Tʀᴀᴅᴇ Cᴏᴍᴍ’ɴ (Apr. 23, 2024) https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-announces-rule-banning-noncompetes [https://perma.cc/9ZYD-R8J9]; See also Ryan, LLC v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, No. 3:24-CV-00986-E, 2024 WL 3879954 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2024).

[15] Senate Bill S4641A; See also Clifford R. Atlas, Erik J. Winton & Cooper Binsky, NY’s Non-Compete Bill: What Employers Can Expect from a Newly Proposed Ban, Jᴀᴄᴋsᴏɴ Lᴇᴡɪs (Feb. 13, 2025) https://www.jacksonlewis.com/insights/nys-non-compete-bill-what-employers-can-expect-newly-proposed-ban [https://perma.cc/D3SU-3ZF5].

[16] Id.

[17] Id.

[18] Employment and Labor Insight: 2024 Salary Thresholds and Notice Requirements for Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Provisions in Employment Agreements, Gᴜɴᴅᴇʀsᴏɴ Dᴇᴛᴛᴍᴇʀ (Feb. 15, 2024), https://www.gunder.com/en/news-insights/insights/employment-and-labor-insight-2024-salary-thresholds-and-notice-requirements-for-non-competition-and-non-solicitation-provisions-in-employment-agreements.

[19]  Veto Message on No. 133, S. 5141 (Dec. 22, 2024), https://www.crowell.com/a/web/czSsRVAdepa5GuFvEoV1vu/veto_133.pdf.

[20]  Id.

[21] Taber, Rizzo & Killalea, supra note 6.

[22] Atlas, Winton & Binsky, supra note 15.

[23] Highly compensated individuals are defined in the bill as any individual who is compensated annually $500,000 or more. Atlas, Winton & Binsky, supra note 15.

[24]  Id.

[25] The rationale behind an increasing number of states in banning non-competes in healthcare fields, is that a provider’s inability to practice medicine could limit patient care. Veto Message on No. 133, supra note 19.

[26]  Atlas, Winton & Binsky, supra note 15.

[27] Benjamin Ferrucci, Brendan J. Lowd, Nikki M. Rivers, Zachary H. Liebnick, What the FTC’s New Rule on Non-Competes Means for M&A and Private Equity Transactions, Mɪɴᴛᴢ (May 23, 2024) https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2226/2024-05-23-what-ftcs-new-rule-non-competes-means-ma-andprivate#:~:text=In%20addition%20to%20non%2Dcompetes,connection%20with%20their%20continued%20employment [https://perma.cc/WP8R-LPGE].

[28]  Id.

[29]  Id.

[30] Atlas, Winton & Binsky, supra note 15.

[31] Sean M. Ryan, Commentary: Noncompete agreements are bad for workers, bad for consumers, and bad for the economy, Aʟʙᴀɴʏ Tɪᴍᴇs U. (May 16, 2023) https://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/commentary-noncompete-agreements-bad-workers-18100145.php [https://perma.cc/KZS8-387M].

[32]  Id.

[33] Will New York State Lawmakers Ban Non-Competes in 2025? Here’s What Employers Need to Know About a Brewing State Law Trend, Fɪsʜᴇʀ Pʜɪʟʟɪᴘs (Dec. 12, 2024) https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/news-insights/will-new-york-state-lawmakers-ban-non-competes.html [https://perma.cc/96Q4-9SBL].

[34] Employment and Labor Insight: 2024 Salary Thresholds and Notice Requirements for Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Provisions in Employment Agreements, supra note 18.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Splintering of “Catalyst Theory” in New York

Some of the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Divisions are now recognizing “catalyst theory” as a part of the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). To preserve the intent of the EAJA,

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page